Showing posts with label Alan Rickman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alan Rickman. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Theater Review: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part II

I am not going to sit here and hash out the entire story line of the final Harry Potter film. If you are currently a fan of the series, you have no doubt read the book or most likely have seen the final film anyway.

So, my ramblings will just blend with what you already know and what you have already read on many other blog and review sites.

My review may be a bit different. I have waited patiently like so many others as the Harry Potter films have been released - usually once a year with a few that took a little longer. But, I have never read a single one of J.K. Rowling's books.

No, I was first introduced to Harry, Hermione and Ron during a showing of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone - well after the second film had already been released. Was I blown away? No. But I was definitely intrigued enough to go and see the third film.

It was right around this time that I introduced my mother, my wife and my sister to the books - weird I know, since I have never read a single one - and they fell in love with them.

So, the quartet of us went to a Friday showing of the final film, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part II - which picks up right where the first one ends.

Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) is still searching for Voldemort's horcruxes with Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint). But, they are having a bit more luck during the first half of this film than they did in the entire first film.

This is all leading up to what would be the final showdown between Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) and Harry. Which takes place at Hogwarts - but before their final battle, a much larger battle looms between the Death Eaters and many horrible creatures taking on the witches and wizards in Hogwarts walls.

Many perished on both sides to protect and serve their leaders - but it is up to Harry to end this war once and for all by taking out the enemy who killed his parents and so many others.

In my last Harry Potter theater experience I felt somewhat dissatisfied. Possibly because the story didn't really end - but I also felt like the entire film was Harry, Ron and Hermione camping. Nothing else really seemed to happen (I re-watched the film on DVD and my original feeling was wrong).

This time, however, I was engaged throughout. We pick up Harry and the gang right where we left them and they immediately are off to find another horcrux, but this time they know where it is - and there is actual adventure when they get there. It was fun to watch - and it continued pretty much nonstop.

As I said before, I had never read the books before - so there were a few things in the film that sort of confused (thankfully I had the other three with me to straighten out any of my questions).

For instance, I was a bit confused by the resurrection stone. I really wasn't sure what it did, or why it was needed. I thought that it was used to resurrect someone when they died, and of course Harry may need this.

Another thing that I mistook (which I took a lot of flak for by Mrs. Kano) was that I was sort of led to believe that Severus Snape (Alan Rickman) may have been Harry's father. I guess looking back at everything else in the other movies I should have known better - but that montage was a bit misleading (ok, laugh at me if you want).

I can't really give out some of my favorite parts of the movie, because they could be potential spoilers for those who haven't seen it. I will say this - it was a great way to end one of the most possible film franchises (ifItalic not the) in years.

I even got chills as they panned back from Hogwarts at the conclusion of the film - before the real conclusion.

It has been an amazing run for these characters. Eight films, and a finale that, if not perfect, was pretty darn close. A great way to say goodbye to characters we have seen grown up.

Goodbye. Thanks for an amazing adventure.

Grade:

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Die Hard Tetralogy

I had to watch Die Hard: With a Vengeance for a project I had to do in my math class. And I didn't want to watch the third movie, without at watching the first two.

I swear I had watched these movies before, but after I got through the three of them I realized, that I may have only seen the third one - despite recognizing a few scenes in the first two, I don't think I have watched them as a whole.

So, this week I watched the Die Hard Tetralogy - including last year's release of Live Free or Die Hard.

Instead of large reviews each film, I will do what I have been doing with smaller reviews of a handful of movies - but as a whole I would have to give this tetralogy an Excellent grade.

Title: Die Hard.

Starring: Bruce Willis, Bonnie Bedelia, Reginald VelJohnson, Paul Gleason, William Atherton and Alan Rickman.

Brief Synopsis: John McClane (Willis) is heading to LA to be with his estranged wife Holly (Bedelia) and his two kids. Holly had moved to LA for a job, leaving NY police office McClane behind. After arriving at her office during a Christmas party, Hans Gruber (Rickman) and his gang take over the building in an attempt to steal a large amount of money. And it's up to McClane to save the day.

Opinion: I have to admit I love a good, smart villain and Rickman's Gruber was outstanding. He had thought of basically everything to get away scott free with a ton of money, and it was fun to see everything play out. What he didn't count on was McClane - who is truly an every man's hero.

Grade:

Title: Die Hard 2.

Starring: Bruce Willis, Bonnie Bedelia, William Sadler, William Atherton, John Amos and Dennis Franz.

Brief Synopsis: McClane is visiting his wife's parents for Christmas and is currently awaiting Holly's arrival at the airport. That same afternoon, General Esperanzo is being transported via plane to the area. McClane becomes supsicious when he finds two men in the baggage department of the airport - but receives little help from Capt. Lorenzo (Franz). Col. Stuart (Sadler) and his men take over the airport and all the airport guidance systems in order to free Esperanzo. Of course, McClane proves to be a one-man army again to take down the villains.

Opinion: I still enjoyed this film, but it was lacking a lot of what the first one had. Plus, it almost tried to copy the first one as McClane was all alone in saving the day. Sadler was pretty good as the villain, but not as great as Rickman's character in the first film. Still a solid showing, but probably my least favorite of all of them.

Grade:

Title: Die Hard: With a Vengeance.

Starring: Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson, Larry Bryggman and Jeremy Irons.

Brief Synopsis: A criminal mastermind, Simon Gruber (Irons) has stolen gallons of a liquid bomb which is set off in downtown New York. Gruber is also holding a grudge against McClane for killing his brother, Hans. So, he enlists McClane - and later Zeus Carver (Jackson) - to play a handful of games, including riddles and math problems, in order to save a school.

Opinion: This film was highly entertaining, and although I was not sure if giving McClane a partner would work - it truly did with Jackson's performance and the two played very well against each other. Irons still wasn't up to the task of Rickman's performance, but he was very convincing as Simon. The riddles and games as a diversion was also very clever and pretty entertaining in trying to figure out along with Carver and McClane.

Grade:

Title: Live Free or Die Hard.

Starring: Bruce Willis, Justin Long, Timothy Olyphant, Maggie Q, Kevin Smith and Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

Brief Synopsis: 12 years after the last film, McClane is a police lietenant and is given the assignment of tracking down and bringing in a computer hacker, Matt Farrell (Long). What he doesn't realize is that Farrell has accidentally helped Thomas Gabriel (Olyphant) take over the world's computers - and cause a "fire sale". McClane has to keep Farrell alive, track down Gabriel and also rescue his daughter Lucy (Winstead) before Gabriel shuts down the entire coutnry.

Opinion: A bit updated as the events take place in 2006 or 2007, which was very interesting to see McClane adapt. He has never been happy with technology, and seems even further behind now. Not technically a sidekick, Long was very entertaining as Farrell - and Olyphant was a great villain, who technically thought he was a do gooder.

Grade: